EXPOSURE DRAFT FOR COMMENT Distributed solely for peer review. Not for public distribution, attribution, or quotation. This draft represents a work in progress; final conclusions may differ significantly. May 31 Draft.
By Jerry Lawson
While many of us are still trying to wrap
When and why should presenters act like Phil Donahue? Sara Kubik knows.
Sara recently observed: “I anticipate having audience input and will actually encourage it. Like Phil Donahue style.”
Incorporating audience feedback can strengthen nearly any presentation.
One powerful technique expands on Sara’s approach:
I try to ask questions designed to lead audience members
The New York legislature–pressured by the organized bar–is on the verge of enacting restrictions that will make it difficult to use AI to close the access-to-justice gap. Even worse, this is merely one of many similar efforts elsewhere, some statutory and some regulatory.
It’s pretty ugly, since multiple studies have shown a continuing unmet need
The marketing promise for premium legal RAG-based models was a hallucination-free experience. The empirical reality is different. Why?
It is a structural problem, created by the way Large Language Models are created. The process includes inputting large amounts of information. This typically includes all the publicly available information on the Internet.
The next step is
Has the Internet made books obsolete? Not so far as I’m concerned. I have 20+ titles in my personal library of books about presentations—and I’ve even read most of them. If I could keep only three, my choices would be:
Since the publication
She begged “Do not do that,” then “STOP OPENCLAW.” Neither worked.
That’s what happened to Summer Yue, Meta’s Director of Alignment at their superintelligence safety lab. By the time she reached her desktop to kill the process manually, the AI agent she’d created had already deleted hundreds of emails. You would expect someone with
Every year brings a new legal-technology miracle. In 2026, the most aggressively promoted one may be “AI for discovery.” If you have attended even a single conference lately, you have heard the pitch. AI will slash review costs. AI will eliminate drudgery. AI will—apparently any day now—fetch your coffee. That last claim remains unproven.
What
Let’s stop blaming the hallucinations and focus on the real problem:
Lawyers who don’t do their job because they are too busy, too lazy, or too incompetent.
The lawyer who cites a hallucinated AI case and the lawyer who cites a real case without reading it have committed the same ethical failure. Today, it’s usually
The hype machine is working overtime on Agentic AI. Don’t fall for it.
AI chatbots merely respond to prompts. They only give you information. AI agents like Claude Cowork or Openclaw go beyond this. They are built on large language models, but can take action on your behalf.
That sounds great, but there is a